Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Err, with Tom's objections, why was this applied? > * Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001028 11:34]: >> Applied. Thanks. Itchy trigger finger today, Bruce? Please revert the change --- I'm still discussing it with Kevin offlist, but I don't feel it's acceptable as-is because it breaks reasonable (non-redundant) UNION/INTERSECT/EXCEPT constructs that have worked for several releases past. regards, tom lane
- [HACKERS] Gram.y patches for better parenthesis handling... Kevin O'Gorman
- Re: [HACKERS] Gram.y patches for better parenthesis... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Gram.y patches for better parenthesis... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Gram.y patches for better parenth... Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] Gram.y patches for better par... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Gram.y patches for better... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Gram.y patches for better par... The Hermit Hacker
- [HACKERS] Re: I believe it will (was Re: Hmm, will ... Kevin O'Gorman
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: I believe it will (was Re: Hm... Philip Warner