Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Err, with Tom's objections, why was this applied?

> * Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001028 11:34]:
>> Applied.   Thanks.

Itchy trigger finger today, Bruce?

Please revert the change --- I'm still discussing it with Kevin offlist,
but I don't feel it's acceptable as-is because it breaks reasonable
(non-redundant) UNION/INTERSECT/EXCEPT constructs that have worked for
several releases past.

                        regards, tom lane

Reply via email to