Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I think the issue is that we don't want to risk breaking pg_dumpall in a
> minor release.
 
> Comments?

For 7.0.x, let's leave pg_dumpall alone -- it's too important to risk
breakage without extensive beta testing prior to release.  An added
contrib utility is not a problem -- in fact, contrib tree changes, being
that they're by nature not a part of the main tree, probably can be
accomodated even when main tree changes can't.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11

Reply via email to