Bruce Momjian wrote: > I think the issue is that we don't want to risk breaking pg_dumpall in a > minor release. > Comments? For 7.0.x, let's leave pg_dumpall alone -- it's too important to risk breakage without extensive beta testing prior to release. An added contrib utility is not a problem -- in fact, contrib tree changes, being that they're by nature not a part of the main tree, probably can be accomodated even when main tree changes can't. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/contrib/pg_dumpaccou... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/contrib/pg_dump... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/contrib/pg_dump... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/contrib/pg_... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/contrib/pg_... Ned Lilly
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/contrib... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/con... Vince Vielhaber
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/contrib... Karl DeBisschop
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/contrib... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/contrib... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/con... Bruce Momjian