> I have to agree with Peter E. on this patch: it's poorly thought out.
Now you tell me. :-)
> I don't mind the idea of being able to relocate the socket file,
> but the client-side interface they've chosen is silly. Having to
> add another switch to every client app is not reasonable --- it's
> bad enough that you had to hack every one of the clients we supply,
> but what of client apps that just use libpq or one of the other
> interface libraries? They'll be unable to talk to such a postmaster
> without further work.
The only solution for other apps is to use the environment variable
PGUNXSOCKET or use PQconnectdb with unixsocket="lkjasdf".
Overloading the hostname with a leading slash is another nice option.
If I do that in libpq, then all the apps can benefit, right?
> We should revert all the client-side changes from this patch, and
> instead teach libpq and the other interfaces to treat a host name
> that starts with a slash as being a path to a socket file (replacing
> the default assumption of "/tmp"). Much cleaner, especially for
> existing client apps.
I can easily back out whatever you want. Let me back out the client
changes, and hack libpq to handle the leading slash. Sounds good.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
