On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 09:32:43AM -0600, Ross J. Reedstrom wrote: > On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 04:16:26PM +1100, Philip Warner wrote: > > Create Module foo_mod from library 'path-to-lib'; > > Phil - be careful with the nomenclature. We've got another naming collision, > here. SQL9[29] talk about modules, which may or may not be related to what > your suggesting here. Do you know any url's where the SQL* standards could be looked up? Mark Hollomon's idea was to use 'package' not 'module', but ofcourse it would be nice to be SQL* conforming. -- marko
- AW: [HACKERS] Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function la... Zeugswetter Andreas SB
- Re: [HACKERS] Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' functi... Marko Kreen
- AW: [HACKERS] Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' functi... Zeugswetter Andreas SB
- Re: [HACKERS] Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' fu... 'Marko Kreen'
- Re: [HACKERS] Coping with 'C' vs 'newC... mlw
- Re: [HACKERS] Coping with 'C' vs '... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Coping with 'C'... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Coping with... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Coping ... Ross J. Reedstrom
- Re: [HACKERS] Coping ... 'Marko Kreen'
- Re: [HACKERS] Coping ... Don Baccus
- Re: [HACKERS] Coping ... Ross J. Reedstrom
- AW: [HACKERS] Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' functi... Zeugswetter Andreas SB
- AW: [HACKERS] Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' functi... Zeugswetter Andreas SB