> BTW, I thought you were backing out the unnecessary changes to the > client applications? pg_dump seems not to be reverted yet, for one... I thought I had. I don't see them here. Can you tell me what you see. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
- [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hosting supp... David J. MacKenzie
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hosting ... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hos... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL vir... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hosting ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hos... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL vir... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Postg... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] P... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hosting ... David J. MacKenzie
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hosting ... David J. MacKenzie
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hos... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual... Ross J. Reedstrom