On Wednesday 22 November 2000 00:54, Tom Lane wrote: > > I don't know from your post if you thought I was adding > > to the criticism or not, but I can say with certainty I wasn't. > > No, I saw that you understood perfectly, I just wanted to add another > two cents... > > > I'm not denigrating the current efforts, because PG documention's pretty > > good all things considered. But some volunteers devoted to improving > > the docs could accomplish a lot. > > Yup. Anyone out there with the time and interest? > > regards, tom lane I might be interested in helping with it. Whats involved (DocBook, SGML)? -- -------- Robert B. Easter [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------- - CompTechNews Message Board http://www.comptechnews.com/ - - CompTechServ Tech Services http://www.comptechserv.com/ - ---------- http://www.comptechnews.com/~reaster/ ------------
- RE: [HACKERS] Crash during WAL recovery? Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Crash during WAL recovery? Don Baccus
- RE: [HACKERS] Crash during WAL recovery? Christopher Kings-Lynne
- RE: [HACKERS] Crash during WAL recovery? Don Baccus
- Re: [HACKERS] Crash during WAL recove... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Crash during WAL re... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Crash during WAL re... Don Baccus
- Re: [HACKERS] Crash during W... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Crash duri... Robert B. Easter
- Re: [HACKERS] Crash ... Thomas Lockhart
- RE: [HACKERS] Crash during W... Christopher Kings-Lynne
- Re: [HACKERS] Crash during W... Martin A. Marques
- Re: [HACKERS] Crash duri... Thomas Lockhart
- postgres docs (was Re: [HACK... Norman Clarke
- Re: postgres docs (was R... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Crash during WAL re... Hannu Krosing
- RE: [HACKERS] Crash during WAL recovery? Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] Crash during WAL recovery? Mitch Vincent