> > In OS kernel design, you try to avoid process herding bottlenecks. 
> > Here, we want them herded, and giving up the CPU may be the best way to
> > do it.
> 
> Yes, but if everyone yeilds you're back where you started, and with
> 128 or more backends do you really want to cause possibly that many
> context switches per fsync?

You are going to kernel call/yield anyway to fsync, so why not try and
if someone does the fsync, we don't need to do it.  I am suggesting
re-checking the need for fsync after the return from sleep(0).

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Reply via email to