> (the second one fails). Now that I look, this breakage was introduced in > March when "we" expunged operators allowed as identifiers (Tom Lane and > I have blood on our hands on this one ;) See gram.y around line 5409. > Suggestions? Any problems with allowing OVERLAPS and BETWEEN as function names? bison seems happy with no shift/reduce conflicts... - Thomas
- [HACKERS] Re: FWD: tinterval vs interval on pgsql-novice Thomas Lockhart
- [HACKERS] Re: FWD: tinterval vs interval on pgsql-no... Thomas Lockhart
- [HACKERS] Re: FWD: tinterval vs interval on pgsql-no... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: FWD: tinterval vs interval on pgsq... Thomas Lockhart
- [HACKERS] Re: FWD: tinterval vs interval on ... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: FWD: tinterval vs interval... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: FWD: tinterval vs inte... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: FWD: tinterval vs... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: FWD: tinterva... Thomas Lockhart