> Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I would rip it out. > > I thought about that too, but was afraid to suggest it ;-) > > How many people are actually using COPY BINARY? It could be useful if only single scan would be required. But I have no strong opinion about keeping it. Vadim
- [HACKERS] COPY BINARY is broken... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY BINARY is broken... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY BINARY is broken... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY BINARY is broken... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY BINARY is broken... Don Baccus
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY BINARY is broken... Samuel Sieb
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY BINARY is broken... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY BINARY is broken... Bruce Momjian
- RE: [HACKERS] COPY BINARY is broken... Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] COPY BINARY is broken... Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] COPY BINARY is broken... Adriaan Joubert