Re: [HACKERS] Alternative database locations are broken

[Tom Lane]

"Ross J. Reedstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmm, I know NT's not really a target, supported OS, but enshrining
> symlinks in a the design of a backend feature makes it really difficult
> to keep even the semblance of support.

As long as we don't require symlinks to exist for standard setups,
I have no trouble at all with decreeing that alternate database
locations won't work on NT.

                        regards, tom lane