The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2 Dec 2000, Don Baccus wrote:
>
> > > I *am* one of those volunteers
> >
> > Yes, I well remember you screwing up PG 7.0 just before beta, without bothering
> > to test your code, and leaving on vacation.
> >
> > You were irresponsible then, and you're being irresponsible now.
>
> Okay, so let me get this one straight ... it was irresponsible for him to
> put code in that was broken the last time, but it wouldn't be
> irresponsible for us to release code that we don't feel is ready this
> time? *raised eyebrow*
>
> Just want to get this straight, as it kinda sounds hypocritical to me, but
> want to make sure that I understand before I fully arrive at that
> conclusion ... :)
IIRC, this thread woke up on someone complaining about PostgreSQl inc
promising
to release some code for replication in mid-october and asking for
confirmation
that this is just a schedule slip and that the project is still going on
and
going to be released as open source.
What seems to be the answer is: "NO, we will keep the replication code
proprietary".
I have not seen this answer myself, but i've got this impression from
the contents
of the whole discussion.
Do you know if this is the case ?
-----------
Hannu
