Matthew wrote: > The primary advantage that I see is that a single postgres process > can benefit from multiple processors. I see little advantage to using thread > for client connections. Multiprocessors best benefit multiple backends. And the current forked model lends itself admirably to SMP. And I say that even after using a multithreaded webserver (AOLserver) for three and a half years. Of course, AOLserver also sanely uses the multi process PostgreSQL backends in a pooled fashion, but that's beside the point. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
- Re: [HACKERS] Using Threads? Bruce Guenter
- Re: [HACKERS] Using Threads? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Using Threads? Junfeng Zhang
- Re: [HACKERS] Using Threads? Tom Samplonius
- Re: [HACKERS] Using Threads? Bruce Guenter
- Re: [HACKERS] Using Threads? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Using Threads? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Using Threads? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Using Threads? Bruce Momjian
- RE: [HACKERS] Using Threads? Matthew
- Re: [HACKERS] Using Threads? Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Using Threads? Myron Scott
- Re: [HACKERS] Using Threads? Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] Using Threads? Myron Scott
- Re: [HACKERS] Using Threads? Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] Using Threads? Myron Scott
- Re: [HACKERS] Using Threads? Karel Zak
- Re: [HACKERS] Using Threads Myron Scott
- Re: [HACKERS] Using Threads Karel Zak
- Re: [HACKERS] Using Threads The Hermit Hacker