Bruce Guenter wrote: > > - Assume that a CRC is a guarantee. A CRC would be a good addition to > help ensure the data wasn't broken by flakey drive firmware, but > doesn't guarantee consistency. Even a CRC per transaction (it could be a nice END record) ? Bye! -- Daniele ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Daniele Orlandi - Utility Line Italia - http://www.orlandi.com Via Mezzera 29/A - 20030 - Seveso (MI) - Italy -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testi... Ross J. Reedstrom
- AW: [HACKERS] beta testing version Zeugswetter Andreas SB
- AW: [HACKERS] beta testing version Zeugswetter Andreas SB
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] beta testing version Tom Lane
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] beta testing version Daniele Orlandi
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] beta testing version Bruce Guenter
- [HACKERS] CRCs (was: beta testing ver... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] CRCs (was: beta tes... Bruce Guenter
- Re: [HACKERS] CRCs (was: bet... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] CRCs (was:... Bruce Guenter
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] beta testing versio... Daniele Orlandi
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] beta testing ve... Bruce Guenter
- RE: AW: [HACKERS] beta testi... Christopher Kings-Lynne
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] beta testi... Daniele Orlandi
- [HACKERS] CRCs (was: beta testing version) Nathan Myers