> Is there any prospect of making the output filenames more predictable?
> Who should I annoy about it?
Well, you could annoy me about it...
... and I would go to my local installation of the source tree...
... and build the docs to confirm that the *chapters* have good
predictable names...
... and find the *every* .htm file has a "good" name. Hmm. Is it the
fact that someone went through and added an "id field" to every chapter
and section header? Whoever it was, good job! It wasn't me, but whoever
it was: good job :)
Ah, a perusal of the cvs log shows that Peter E. is the culprit. Looks
like it is a non-issue from here on.
- Thomas
- [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, finally ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, finally ... Martin A. Marques
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, finally ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, finally ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, finally ... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, finally ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, fina... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...packa... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...p... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, ... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...packa... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...p... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...p... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, finally ... Martin A. Marques
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 (ODBC driver?) Joel Burton
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 (ODBC driver?... The Hermit Hacker
