> > We could fix this either by adding a new hash function to support > > macaddr, or by removing the pg_amXXX entries that claim macaddr is > > hashable. Either change will not take effect without an initdb, > > however, and I'm loath to force one now that we've started beta. > > If we're going to add CRC to log then we need > in beta anyway... ^^^^^^^^^ Ops - we need in INITDB... > Are we going? Vadim
- [HACKERS] Hash index on macaddr -> crash Tom Lane
- RE: [HACKERS] Hash index on macaddr -> crash Darren King
- RE: [HACKERS] Hash index on macaddr -> crash Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] Hash index on macaddr -> crash Mikheev, Vadim