> It looks like other people just didn't use index decompression function > (at least in Gene's code decompression function just do return ) and > that's why this bug was not discovered. We could make a patch for > upcoming 7.1 if hackers desired. I consider this patch as a bugfix > not a new feature or improvement. We got a very promising results. Yes, send patches! Thanks to you and Gene for getting GiST back into view; it seems like a great feature which was neglected for too long. - Thomas
- Re: [HACKERS] Indexing for geographic objec... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Indexing for geographic o... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] Indexing for geograp... Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] Indexing for geo... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] Indexing for geographic o... Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] Indexing for geograp... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Indexing for geo... Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] Indexing for geographic o... selkovjr
- [HACKERS] index support for arrays... Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] index support fo... Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] index support fo... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] index support fo... Oleg Bartunov
- [GENERAL] RE: [HACKERS] Indexing for geographic objects? Michael Ansley