> It looks like other people just didn't use index decompression function
> (at least in Gene's code decompression function just do return ) and
> that's why this bug was not discovered. We could make a patch for
> upcoming 7.1 if hackers desired. I consider this patch as a bugfix
> not a new feature or improvement. We got a very promising results.
Yes, send patches! Thanks to you and Gene for getting GiST back into
view; it seems like a great feature which was neglected for too long.
- Thomas
- Re: [HACKERS] Indexing for geographic objec... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Indexing for geographic o... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] Indexing for geograp... Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] Indexing for geo... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] Indexing for geographic o... Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] Indexing for geograp... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Indexing for geo... Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] Indexing for geographic o... selkovjr
- [HACKERS] index support for arrays... Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] index support fo... Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] index support fo... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] index support fo... Oleg Bartunov
- [GENERAL] RE: [HACKERS] Indexing for geographic objects? Michael Ansley
