> furthermore, are there any plans to offer a better libpq interface to INSERT? > the things i'm doing now to quote the text, and the extra copy i'm maintaining, > are painful. arbitrary-sized "text" attributes are a huge boon -- we would > never have considered using postgres for MAPS RSS (or RBL) with "large > objects". (kudos to all who were involved, with both WAL and TOAST!) If you are asking for a binary interface to TOAST values, I really wish we had that in 7.1. It never got finished for 7.1. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
- Re: [HACKERS] performance modality in 7.1 for large... Christopher Masto
- Re: [HACKERS] performance modality in 7.1 for large... Paul A Vixie
- Re: [HACKERS] performance modality in 7.1 for large text... Alex Pilosov
- Re: [HACKERS] performance modality in 7.1 for large... Paul A Vixie
- [HACKERS] CIDR output format Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] CIDR output format Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] CIDR output format Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] CIDR output format Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] CIDR output format Alex Pilosov
- Re: [HACKERS] performance modality in 7.1 for l... Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] performance modality in 7.1 for large text... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] performance modality in 7.1 for large text... Tom Lane