Ed Loehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > is there a reason why GEQO is off by > default in the ODBC driver (postdrv.exe)? There may once have been a good reason for that, but it sounds like a mighty bad idea nowadays. AFAICT ODBC's default setting has been that way for as long as ODBC has been in our CVS tree, so no way to know who chose to do that, when, or why. regards, tom lane
- Re: [HACKERS] GEQO status? Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] GEQO status? Ed Loehr
- Re: [HACKERS] GEQO status? Ed Loehr
- Re: [HACKERS] GEQO status? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] GEQO status? Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] GEQO status? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] GEQO status? Ed Loehr
- Re: [HACKERS] GEQO status? Tom Lane