Brent Verner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> after hours in the gdb-hole, I see this... maybe a clue? :)
I don't think that comment means anything. Possibly it's a leftover
from a time when there was something unportable there. But if att_align
were broken on Alphas, you'd have a lot worse problems than what you're
seeing.
regards, tom lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1... Brent Verner
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1... Brent Verner
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1... Tom Lane
- Re: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alph... Tom Lane
- Re: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alph... Brent Verner
- Re: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alph... Oliver Elphick
- Re: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alph... Tom Lane
- Re: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alph... Oliver Elphick
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1... Brent Verner
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha Brent Verner
