The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> someone brought up that when configure runs, it is adding -lreadline to
> the backend compile, even though that I don't think there is any reason
> for doing such?
There isn't --- configure is just sloppy in that it supplies the same
library list for all programs we build. (This might be a fair amount
of work to change; never looked at it.)
However, I don't see what that has to do with the licensing argument.
We stand or fall on psql's use of libreadline, and having useless
dependencies from other executables doesn't alter anything that I can
see.
regards, tom lane
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD ... Trond Eivind Glomsr�d
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Dominic J. Eidson
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Michael Alan Dorman
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD ... Alex Pilosov
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Patrick Welche
