> But given that readline availability during the last five years was
> apparently just fine I don't understand this discussion at all.
I agree with Peter and others on this topic, though the occasional
discussion helps to clarify things...
- Thomas
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Alex Pilosov
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Patrick Welche
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Patrick Welche
- NetBSD libedit (Re: [HACKERS] GNU readl... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Trond Eivind Glomsr�d
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Dominic J. Eidson
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Alfred Perlstein
