> I am strongly inclined to rip out the pseudo-UNDER clause and support > only the old-style INHERITS syntax for 7.1. UNDER is adding no > functionality and I think we will eventually regret using an SQL keyword > for non-SQL semantics. I agree with you, Hannu, et al. If it isn't making a good effort in truely supporting SQL9x, then it isn't yet worth having in the parser. - Thomas
- [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Inheritance docs error. Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Inheritance docs error. Peter Eisentraut
- [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Inheritance docs error. Hannu Krosing
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Inheritance docs error. Robert B. Easter
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Inheritance docs er... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Inheritance doc... Hannu Krosing
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Inheritanc... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Inheritanc... Peter Eisentraut
- Thomas Lockhart