Hiroshi Inoue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> OK. Second proposal: do the init_irels() call in
>> RelationCacheInitializePhase2(). I've just looked through the
>> other stuff that's done in between, and I don't think any of it
>> needs valid relcache entries.
> Oops, I neglected to reply "agreed", sorry.
> It would be much safer for init_irels() to be called
> in a proper transaction than the current implementation.
Fine. Were you going to do it, or do you want me to?
regards, tom lane
