Pete Forman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thinking about that a bit more, I think that tm_isdst should not be > written into. IIRC, setting isdst to -1 was necessary to get the right behavior across DST boundaries on more-mainstream systems. I do not think it's acceptable to do worse on systems with good time libraries in order to improve behavior on fundamentally broken ones. regards, tom lane
- AW: [HACKERS] Re: tinterval - operator problems on ... Zeugswetter Andreas SB
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: tinterval - operator pro... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: tinterval - operator... Nathan Myers
- AW: [HACKERS] Re: tinterval - operator problem... Zeugswetter Andreas SB
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: tinterval - operator... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: tinterval - oper... Pete Forman
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: tinterval - ... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: tinterv... Pete Forman
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: tin... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re:... Pete Forman
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re:... Tom Lane
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re:... Pete Forman
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re:... Tom Lane
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re:... Thomas Lockhart