Tom Lane writes:

> It occurs to me that the only likely use for initdb -t is now served by
>       DROP DATABASE template1;
>       CREATE DATABASE template1 WITH TEMPLATE = template0;
> ie, we have a *real* way to reconstruct a virgin template1 rather than
> an initdb kluge.

I agree.

> Accordingly, I suggest that initdb -t should be flushed entirely.

Kill it.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut      [EMAIL PROTECTED]       http://yi.org/peter-e/

Reply via email to