Tom Lane writes: > It occurs to me that the only likely use for initdb -t is now served by > DROP DATABASE template1; > CREATE DATABASE template1 WITH TEMPLATE = template0; > ie, we have a *real* way to reconstruct a virgin template1 rather than > an initdb kluge. I agree. > Accordingly, I suggest that initdb -t should be flushed entirely. Kill it. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://yi.org/peter-e/
- [HACKERS] "initdb -t" destroys all databases Richard Poole
- Re: [HACKERS] "initdb -t" destroys all dat... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] "initdb -t" destroys all... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] "initdb -t" destroys... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] "initdb -t" dest... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] "initdb -t"... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] "initdb -t&q... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] "initdb -t&q... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] "initdb ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] "initdb ... Bruce Momjian