Re: [HACKERS] C++ interface build on FreeBSD 4.2 broken?

[Patrick Welche]

On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 08:06:51PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> What I've done to solve the immediate C++ problem is to take the
> declaration of sys_nerr out of c.h entirely, and put it into the
> two C modules that actually need it.  However, I'm still wondering
> whether we should not drop the rangecheck on errno completely.

Probably not useful, but in our <errno.h>, sys_nerr is defined

#if !defined(_ANSI_SOURCE) && !defined(_POSIX_C_SOURCE) && \
    !defined(_XOPEN_SOURCE)


P