On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Did we decide against LAZY? > > I thought the core consensus was that it was too risky to install > post-beta. On the other hand, we're installing some other pretty > major fixes. Do we want to re-open that discussion? I would like to see it in myself ... it will be useless post v7.1, with all the work planned for v7.2 ... if there is some way we could get it in before beta4 goes out, I'd feel even better about it ... Vadim? :)
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacuum f... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacu... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacu... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches w... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patc... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patc... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patc... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patc... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patc... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patc... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacuum f... Andrew Snow
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacu... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacu... Alfred Perlstein