> > FOREIGN KEY INSERT & UPDATE/DELETE in transaction "change violation"
> 
>     A well known issue, and I've asked multiple times how exactly
>     we want to define the behaviour for deferred constraints.  Do
>     foreign keys reference just to a key value and are happy with
>     it's existance, or do they refer to a particular row?

Sorry, to answer late. I didn't know this needed clarification.
The answer is simple, foreign keys only reference a key value,
not a particular row.

Andreas

Reply via email to