Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Jan Wieck writes: > > > Exactly the way you want it to do (open(2) and close(2) of a > > UNIX domain socket) was what I had to do to get an old > > Mach3-4.3BSD combo into a kernel-panic. > > The lock file is an ordinary file. So the crazy-temp-vacuum-cleaner on linux doesn't touch the sockets? Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== [EMAIL PROTECTED] # _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
- [HACKERS] Sure enough, the lock file is gone Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Sure enough, the lock file is gone Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Sure enough, the lock file is gon... Ross J. Reedstrom
- Re: [HACKERS] Sure enough, the lock file is... Jan Wieck
- Re: [HACKERS] Sure enough, the lock fil... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Sure enough, the loc... Jan Wieck
- Re: [HACKERS] Sure enough, the... Bruce Guenter
- Re: [HACKERS] Sure enough, the... Oliver Elphick
- Re: [HACKERS] Sure enough,... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Sure enough, the lock file is... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Sure enough, the lock file is gon... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Sure enough, the lock file is... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Sure enough, the lock fil... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Sure enough, the loc... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Sure enough, the... Ross J. Reedstrom
- [HACKERS] Re: Sure enough, the lock file is... GB Clark II