"Hiroshi Inoue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Because I don't know details about trigger stuff, I may be
> misunderstanding. As far as I see, KEY_CHANGED stuff
> requires to log every event about logged tuples.
I just realized that myself. The code was still doing it the hard
way (eg, logging *both* before and after events for each tuple),
but it does seem necessary to log all events if there is either an
UPDATE or DELETE deferred trigger.
> However I'm suspicious if KEY_CHANGED check is necessary.
> Removing KEY_CHANGED stuff seems to solve the TODO
> FOREIGN KEY INSERT & UPDATE/DELETE in transaction "change violation"
> though it may introduce other bugs.
I suspect it just masks the problem by preventing the trigger code
from executing ...
regards, tom lane
