Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Lamar Owen writes: > > I understand why the socket needs to be in /tmp, but why the lockfile? > The lock file protects the Unix domain socket. Consequently, the name of > the lock file needs to be derivable from the name of the socket file, and > vice versa. Also, the name of the socket file must not vary with other > parameters such as installation layout. I see. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
- Re: [HACKERS] Sure enough, the lock fil... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Sure enough, the lock... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Sure enough, the... Ross J. Reedstrom
- [HACKERS] Re: Sure enough, the lock file is... GB Clark II
- Re: [HACKERS] Sure enough, the lock file is gone Alfred Perlstein
- [HACKERS] Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Florent Guillaume
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure enough, the lock file is... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure enough, the lock fil... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure enough, the lock... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure enough, the ... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure enough,... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure eno... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: Sure enough,... Florent Guillaume
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure eno... Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure eno... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure eno... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure eno... Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure eno... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure eno... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure eno... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure eno... Tom Lane