m w <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Here is the problem: Depending on whether there is an > index or not, 'like' behaves differently. Please provide a complete, self-contained example with which we can reproduce the problem. regards, tom lane
- [HACKERS] Like vs '=' bug with indexing m w
- Re: [HACKERS] Like vs '=' bug with indexing Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Like vs '=' bug with indexing m w
- Re: [HACKERS] Like vs '=' bug with indexing Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Like vs '=' bug with indexing m w
- Re: [HACKERS] Like vs '=' bug with indexing Hannu Krosing
- Re: [HACKERS] Like vs '=' bug with ind... m w
- Re: [HACKERS] Like vs '=' bug with ind... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Like vs '=' bug with... Hannu Krosing
- Re: [HACKERS] Like vs '=' bug ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Like vs '=' bug ... Hannu Krosing