Re: [HACKERS] Syslog and pg_options (for RPMs)

[Nathan Myers]

On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 04:00:12PM -0500, Lamar Owen wrote:
> "Dominic J. Eidson" wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Lamar Owen wrote:
> > > A syslogger of stderr would make a nice place to pipe the output :-).
> > > 'postmaster .... 2>&1 | output-to-syslog-program -f facility.desired' or
> 
> > 2>&1 | logger -p facility.level
> [snip]
> >      Logger provides a shell command interface to the syslog(3) system log
> >      module.
> 
> Good. POSIX required, and part of the base system (basically, guaranteed
> to be there on any Linux box).  Thanks for the pointer.

Not so fast... logger just writes its arguments to syslog.  I don't
see any indication that it (portably) reads its standard input.
It's meant for use in shellscripts.  You could write:

 ... 2>&1 | while read i; do logger -p local1.warning -t 'PG ' -- "$i"; done

but syslog is pretty high-overhead already without starting up logger
on every message.  Maybe stderr messages are infrequent enough that
it doesn't matter.

Nathan Myers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]