Ryan Kirkpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > DEBUG: Checkpoint record at (0, 805076492) > postmaster: reaping dead processes... > Startup failed - abort Hm. All we can tell from this is that the startup subprocess exited with nonzero status. Did it leave a corefile? If so, what's the stack trace? regards, tom lane
- [HACKERS] Recovery of PGSQL after system crash failing!!! Ryan Kirkpatrick
- Re: [HACKERS] Recovery of PGSQL after system crash f... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Recovery of PGSQL after system crash f... Vadim Mikheev
- Re: [HACKERS] Recovery of PGSQL after system cra... Ryan Kirkpatrick
- Re: [HACKERS] Recovery of PGSQL after system... Ryan Kirkpatrick
- Re: [HACKERS] Recovery of PGSQL after system... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Recovery of PGSQL after sy... Vadim Mikheev
- Re: [HACKERS] Recovery of PGSQL aft... Ryan Kirkpatrick
- RE: [HACKERS] Recovery of PGSQL after system crash f... Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Recovery of PGSQL after system cra... Ryan Kirkpatrick
- [HACKERS] Re: Recovery of PGSQL after system... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Recovery of PGSQL afte... Bruce Momjian