On 17 Feb 2001 at 17:56 (-0500), Tom Lane wrote:
[snipped]
| Is anyone out there running a 2.4 Linux kernel? Would you try pgbench
| with current sources, commit_delay=0, -B at least 1024, no -F, and see
| how the results change when pg_fsync is made to call fdatasync instead
| of fsync? (It's in src/backend/storage/file/fd.c)
I've not run this requested test, but glibc-2.2 provides this bit
of code for fdatasync, so it /appears/ to me that kernel version
will not affect the test case.
[glibc-2.2/sysdeps/generic/fdatasync.c]
int
fdatasync (int fildes)
{
return fsync (fildes);
}
hth.
brent
--
"We want to help, but we wouldn't want to deprive you of a valuable
learning experience."
http://openbsd.org/mail.html
- [HACKERS] WAL and commit_delay Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL and commit_delay Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL and commit_delay Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL and commit_delay Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL and commit_delay Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL and commit_delay Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL and commit_del... Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL and commit... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL and commit... Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL and commit... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: WAL and co... Brent Verner
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: WAL and co... Nathan Myers
- [HACKERS] Re: Re: WAL and co... Brent Verner
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: WAL and co... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: WAL and co... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: WAL and co... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: WAL and commit... Adriaan Joubert
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: WAL and co... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: WAL and co... Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: WAL and co... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: WAL and co... Nathan Myers
