On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 10:50:17AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Let me add I don't agree with this, and find the whole GPL
> heavy-handedness very distasteful.

Please, not this again.  Is there a piss-and-moan-about-the-GPL 
schedule posted somewhere?  

Either PG is in compliance, or it's not.  Only libreadline's copyright 
holder has the right to complain if it's not.  There is no need to 
speculate; if we care about compliance, we need only ask the owner.  
If the owner says we're violating his license, then we can comply, or
negotiate, or stop using the code.  The GPL is no different from any 
other license, that way.

Complaining about the terms on something you got for nothing has to be 
the biggest waste of time and attention I've seen on this list.

Nathan Myers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to