> At 21:31 23/02/01 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >Now, I know many will complain that we are returning commit while not > >having the stuff on the platter. > > You're definitely right there. > > >Maybe they do, but it seems > >the benefit of grouped fsyncs() is large enough that many will say they > >would rather have this option. > > I'd prefer to wait for a lock manager that supports timeouts and contention > notification. I understand, and if that was going to fix the problem completely, but it isn't. It is just going to allow us more flexibility at guessing who may be about to commit. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitDelay performance improvement Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitDelay performance improvement Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitDelay performance improvemen... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitDelay performance improv... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitDelay performance im... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitDelay performanc... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitDelay perfo... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitDelay perfo... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitDelay perfo... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitDelay perfo... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitDelay perfo... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitDelay perfo... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitDelay perfo... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitDelay perfo... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitDelay perfo... Dominique Quatravaux
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitDelay perfo... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitDelay perfo... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitDelay performance improvemen... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitDelay performance improv... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitDelay performance im... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitDelay performanc... Bruce Momjian