Olivier PRENANT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Testing beta5 on unixware7 gives an error on int8 test while beta4 (I've
> just retested it) works ok.
That's odd. int8.c hasn't changed since beta3 (except in the
float-to-int8 routine, which isn't involved here). Is there any
difference in the src/include/config.h file generated by the two
versions?
regards, tom lane
- [HACKERS] int8 beta5 broken? Olivier PRENANT
- [HACKERS] Re: int8 beta5 broken? Olivier PRENANT
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: int8 beta5 broken? Tom Lane
- RE: [HACKERS] Re: int8 beta5 broken? Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: int8 beta5 broken? Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: int8 beta5 broken? Olivier PRENANT
- Re: [HACKERS] int8 beta5 broken? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] int8 beta5 broken? Peter Eisentraut
