Denis Perchine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Small question... Will it work in console? Or it will be X only?
> >
> > It will be tck/tk, so I guess X only.
>
> That's bad. Cause it will be unuseful for people having databases far away...
> Like me... :-((( Another point is that it is a little bit strange to have
> X-Window on machine with database server... At least if it is not for play,
> but production one...
Well, I use X all the time over far distances - it depends on your
connection... And you are not running an X server on the database server, only
an X client.
But I agree that it would be nice to have monitoring architecture that
allowed a multitude of clients...
regards,
Gunnar
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
- [HACKERS] Re: Performance monito... Gunnar R|nning
- [HACKERS] Re: Performance monito... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monito... Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monito... Karl DeBisschop
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monito... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monito... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor Denis Perchine
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor Denis Perchine
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Performance monitor' Gunnar R|nning
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Performance monitor' Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor Bruce Momjian
- RE: [HACKERS] Performance monitor Mike Mascari
- RE: [HACKERS] Performance monitor Philip Warner
- RE: [HACKERS] Performance monitor Mike Mascari
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor Bruce Momjian
