> For a log file on a busy system, this could improve throughput a lot--batch > commit. You end up with fewer than one fsync() per transaction. This is not the issue, since that is already implemented. The current bunching method might have room for improvement, but there are currently fewer fsync's than transactions when appropriate. Andreas ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- AW: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_S... Zeugswetter Andreas SB
- [HACKERS] Re: AW: Allowing WAL fsync to be don... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Allowing WAL fsync t... Larry Rosenman
- [HACKERS] Re: AW: Allowing WAL fsync to be... Tom Lane
- Zeugswetter Andreas SB