Re: Re[4]: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC

[Alfred Perlstein]

> On 3/16/01, 11:10:34 AM, The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote 
> regarding Re: Re[4]: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC :
> 
> > But, with shared libraries, are you really pulling in a "whole
> > thread-support library"?  My understanding of shared libraries (altho it
> > may be totally off) was that instead of pulling in a whole library, you
> > pulled in the bits that you needed, pretty much as you needed them ...


* Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010316 10:02] wrote:
> Yes, you are.  On UnixWare, you need to add -Kthread, which CHANGES a LOT 
> of primitives to go through threads wrappers and scheduling.
> 
> See the doc on the http://UW7DOC.SCO.COM or http://www.lerctr.org:457/ 
> web pages.
> 
> Also, some functions are NOT available without the -Kthread or -Kpthread 
> directives. 

This is true on FreeBSD as well.

-- 
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
    (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])