> On 3/16/01, 11:10:34 AM, The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > regarding Re: Re[4]: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC : > > > But, with shared libraries, are you really pulling in a "whole > > thread-support library"? My understanding of shared libraries (altho it > > may be totally off) was that instead of pulling in a whole library, you > > pulled in the bits that you needed, pretty much as you needed them ... * Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010316 10:02] wrote: > Yes, you are. On UnixWare, you need to add -Kthread, which CHANGES a LOT > of primitives to go through threads wrappers and scheduling. > > See the doc on the http://UW7DOC.SCO.COM or http://www.lerctr.org:457/ > web pages. > > Also, some functions are NOT available without the -Kthread or -Kpthread > directives. This is true on FreeBSD as well. -- -Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Re: Re[2]: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done via ... Alfred Perlstein
- Re[4]: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done via... Xu Yifeng
- Re: Re[4]: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be ... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Re[4]: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be ... Tom Lane
- Re: Re[4]: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be ... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Re[4]: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be ... Tom Lane
- Re: Re[4]: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: Re[4]: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be ... Larry Rosenman
- Re: Re[4]: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be ... Tom Lane
- Re: Re[4]: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be ... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done vi... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done vi... William K. Volkman
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done vi... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done vi... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done vi... Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done vi... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done vi... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done vi... Bruce Momjian
- Re: Re[4]: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be ... Doug McNaught
- Re: Re[2]: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done... Bruce Momjian
- Re: Re[2]: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be ... Alfred Perlstein