Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor signal handler

[Jan Wieck]

Tom Lane wrote:
> Now this would put a pretty tight time constraint on the collector:
> fall more than 4K behind, you start losing data.  I am not sure if
> a UDP socket would provide more buffering or not; anyone know?

    Looks  like Linux has something around 16-32K of buffer space
    for UDP sockets. Just from eyeballing the  fprintf(3)  output
    of my destructively hacked postleprechaun.


Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== [EMAIL PROTECTED] #



_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html