> I'm rerunning to see if it is intermittent. Second run -- no > error. Running a third time......no error. Now I'm confused. > What would cause such an error, Tom? I'm going to check on my Hmm, concurrent checkpoint? Probably we could simplify dirty test in ByfferSync() - ie test bufHdr->cntxDirty without holding shlock (and pin!) on buffer: should be good as long as we set cntxDirty flag *before* XLogInsert in access methods. Have to look more... Vadim ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Re: [HACKERS] RPM building (wa... Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [HACKERS] RPM building... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] RPM building... Justin Clift
- Re: [HACKERS] RPM building... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] RPM building... Justin Clift
- Re: [HACKERS] RPM building... Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [HACKERS] RPM building (wa... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] RPM building... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] RPM building... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] RPM building... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta 6 Regression results on Redat 7.0... Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Beta 6 Regression results on Redat 7.0... Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Beta 6 Regression results on Redat 7.0... Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Beta 6 Regression results on Redat 7.0... Mikheev, Vadim