On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > This will not be RC1 :-( > 'Ive already gotten a > couple occurrences of Lamar's failure. Well, I was at least hoping it was a problem here -- particularly since I haven't been able to reproduce it. But, since it is not a local problem, I'm glad I caught it -- on the first regression test run, no less. I've run a dozen tests since without duplication. Although, like you, Tom, I'm curious as to why it hadn't showed up before -- is the fact that this is a slow machine a factor, possibly? Although I am now much more leery of our regression suite -- this issue isn't even tested, in reality. Do we have _any_ WAL-related tests? The parallel testing is a good thing -- but I wonder what boundary conditions aren't getting tested. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
- [HACKERS] Beta 6 Regression results on Redat 7.0. Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta 6 Regression results on Reda... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta 6 Regression results on ... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta 6 Regression results... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta 6 Regression res... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta 6 Regressio... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta 6 Regre... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta 6 Regre... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta 6 R... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta 6 R... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta 6 R... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta 6 Regression results on Reda... The Hermit Hacker
- [HACKERS] Re: Beta 6 Regression results on Reda... Thomas Lockhart
- [HACKERS] Re: Beta 6 Regression results on ... Lamar Owen
- [HACKERS] Re: Beta 6 Regression results... Thomas Lockhart
- [HACKERS] Re: Beta 6 Regression res... Lamar Owen
- [HACKERS] RPM building (was re... Thomas Lockhart
- [HACKERS] Re: RPM building... Thomas Swan
- Re: [HACKERS] RPM building... Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [HACKERS] RPM buil... Thomas Lockhart