On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Thomas Lockhart wrote: > > Solaris x86/7 results, for example, in geometry.out, show a difference of: > > 3,-3.06204718156754e-11 (expected) > > 3,-3.06204718035418e-11 (results) > > acceptable diviation? > > That sort of deviation is well within bounds, particularly for geometry > tests which might have some transcendental math involved. > > Is Solaris-x86 ready to go then? Nope, still working through some things ... the select_implicit test failed completely: dragon:/home/centre/marc/src/postgresql-7.1RC1/src/test/regress> more results/select_implicit.out psql: connectDBStart() -- connect() failed: Connection refused Is the postmaster running locally and accepting connections on Unix socket '/tmp/.s.PGSQL.65432'? I'm going to re-run the test(s) and see if its an isolated thing or not ... ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platfor... Giles Lean
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platfor... Patrick Welche
- [HACKERS] Re: Call for platfor... Thomas Lockhart
- [HACKERS] Re: Call for platfor... Patrick Welche
- [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Thomas Lockhart
- [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms The Hermit Hacker
- [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platfor... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for pla... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for pla... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for pla... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for pla... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for pla... Patrick Welche
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for pla... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for pla... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for pla... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platfor... Peter Eisentraut