Can't we do something with atexit or other PORTABLE end stuff?
I'll look at it for 7.2.
LER
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
On 3/22/01, 10:16:03 AM, Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regarding
Re: [HACKERS] odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go.:
> Larry Rosenman writes:
> > cc -G -Wl,-z,text -Wl,-h,libpsqlodbc.so.0 -Wl,-Bsymbolic info.o bind.o
columninfo.o connection.o convert.o drvconn.o environ.o execute.o lobj.o
misc.o options.o pgtypes.o psqlodbc.o qresult.o results.o socket.o parse.o
statement.o gpps.o tuple.o tuplelist.o dlg_specific.o -lm
-Wl,-R/usr/local/pgsql/lib -o libpsqlodbc.so.0.26
> > UX:ld: ERROR: psqlodbc.o: symbol: '_fini' multiply defined; also in file
/usr/ccs/lib/crti.o
> > gmake[3]: *** [libpsqlodbc.so.0.26] Error 1
> This is a known portability problem on Unixware (at least known to me)
and
> probably other non-GCC setups.
> > Why do WE define _fini?
> Because we need to 'fini' something, I suspect.
> --
> Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://yi.org/peter-e/
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
