Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> need to kill the _init too. Then we get other symbol issues, I think due
> to -Wl,z,text, but I'm not sure.
Um. This suggests that the real problem is a completely wrong approach
to linking the shared lib. On this evidence I'm not going to touch the
_init/_fini ... looks more like you should be fooling with linker
switches.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
- Re: [HACKERS] odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: ... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: ... Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: ... Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: ... Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: ... Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: ... Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: ... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: ... Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: ... Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: ... Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: ... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: ... Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go. Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go. Larry Rosenman
