> > Recent changes in pg_crc.c (64 bit CRC) introduced non 
> portable constants of the form:
> 
> >  -c -o pg_crc.o pg_crc.c
> >       287 |         0x0000000000000000, 0x42F0E1EBA9EA3693,
> >             ............................a..................
> > a - 1506-207 (W) Integer constant 0x42F0E1EBA9EA3693 out of range.
> 
> Please observe that this is a warning, not an error.  Your proposed
> fix is considerably worse than the disease, because it will break on
> compilers that do not recognize "LL" constants, to say nothing of
> machines where L is correct and LL is some yet wider datatype.
> 
> I'm aware that some compilers will produce warnings about these
> constants, but there should not be any that fail completely, since
> (a) we won't be compiling this code unless we've proven that the
> compiler supports a 64-bit-int datatype, and 

Unfortunately configure does not check the use of 64 bit integer 
constants. A little check on AIX shows, that it indeed DOES NOT work !!!!!

$ ./a.out
hex: 0x012345670ABCDEF0LL==12345670abcdef0, 0x012345670ABCDEF0==abcdef02ff22ff8

> (b) the C standard
> forbids a compiler from requiring width suffixes (cf. 6.4.4.1 in C99).

Maybe that standard is somewhat too recent to rely upon 100%.

> I don't think it's a good tradeoff to risk breaking some platforms in
> order to suppress warnings from overly anal-retentive compilers.

I really do expect other compilers to break on this too. Thus I think
a workaround is needed. As it stands the code does not compute 
a valid CRC64 on all platforms.

Do you want me to supply an AIX specific patch with #if defined (_AIX) ?

Andreas

ti.c


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
    (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Reply via email to