Hi all, The OpenSSL guys are working on a solution to the conflicting des_encrypt() function names on Solaris and Unixware. Whilst this bodes well for future versions, how are we going to work around conflicts with existing versions? Regards and best wishes, Justin Clift -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Delayed release of OpenSSL 0.9.6a beta 3 Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 15:02:15 +0200 (MET DST) From: Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] The release of OpenSSL 0.9.6a beta3 and the true release have been delayed. The reason for the delay is mainly due to the following paper and the need to add a fix for the problem it describes: http://crypto.stanford.edu/~dabo/abstracts/faults.html The problem is now fixed in the current source tree. At the same time, we're trying to solve the last small known problem (the reported clash with des_encrypt() on some systems), to make sure that beta 3 has a fair chance of becoming the actual release. Thanks for your patience. -- Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chairman@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47 Redakteur@Stacken \ SWEDEN \ or +46-709-50 36 10 Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/ Software Engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/ Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400. See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
