Mark Knox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, this patch seems to produce attlens of 6 as desired, but it > causes many (13) of the regression tests to fail. Do you want to see > the regression.diffs? >> >> Please. > See attached. Does look pretty broken, but I don't see how my idea would have led to all this other stuff failing. Anyway, I guess the path of least resistance is to install your ARM-specific packing patch. It's important to make sure that sizeof(ItemPointerData) is 6 if at all possible, since it will cost you four or so wasted bytes in every tuple header if it's not. Will take care of it for RC2. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Mark Knox
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Mark Knox
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Mark Knox
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Mark Knox
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Mark Knox
- RE: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Mayers, Philip J
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Henry B. Hotz
- [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Henry B. Hotz
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Giles Lean
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Patrick Welche